If you’ve ever looked at buying physical, trading futures contracts or leveraged bullion products, you’ve likely noticed something surprising: margin requirements for silver are often significantly higher, in percentage terms, than for gold. But why is that?
At first glance, this might seem counterintuitive. Gold is more expensive per ounce and often viewed as the more volatile, headline-grabbing metal. Yet silver consistently carries higher percentage margins. Here’s what’s going on under the hood.
Silver is often referred to as "gold’s wild cousin" — and for good reason. While gold tends to move steadily based on macroeconomic indicators, silver can experience rapid and unpredictable price swings. This is partly because the silver market is far smaller and less liquid than gold’s, meaning large trades can move the market more dramatically. Exchanges account for this increased volatility by requiring higher margins from traders.
Another factor behind higher silver margins is the cost and logistics of storage. Silver is far less dense in value than gold, meaning it takes up considerably more space to store the same dollar amount. For example, $100,000 worth of gold can fit in the palm of your hand, while the equivalent in silver might fill several shoeboxes. This larger volume means higher storage fees, greater security costs, and more logistical complexity — all of which contribute to higher carrying costs that brokers and exchanges factor into margin requirements.
Roughly half of silver’s demand comes from industrial uses — electronics, solar panels, batteries, and medical applications. This makes silver prices highly sensitive to changes in global manufacturing output and technology shifts, adding another layer of unpredictability. Gold, by contrast, is primarily a monetary metal with more stable demand.
Because silver is cheaper per ounce, investors often take larger positions to match the notional value of their gold holdings. This amplifies potential losses on leveraged trades. To protect the integrity of the market, brokers and exchanges set higher margin requirements on silver to reduce systemic risk from over-leveraged positions.
Silver has a bit of a reputation — thanks in part to events like the 1980 Hunt Brothers’ attempt to corner the market, and more recently, the “Silver Squeeze” movement inspired by online retail traders. These surges in retail speculation increase perceived risk and drive up required margins as a protective buffer against volatility.
While gold often steals the spotlight as a store of value, silver plays an equally compelling role — but with a much higher degree of unpredictability. Margin requirements reflect this. For investors, understanding the mechanics behind margin differences isn’t just academic — it’s critical to risk management, especially in leveraged environments.